Truth Tables Knowledge Base
Truth tables.............? I need help constructing a truth table for geometry. Please explain how it works >< p→~q p→q Also, does the truth table differ depending on the statement?
Does anyone know how to do truth tables? Can anyone figure out how to make truth tables for the following questions and if the following symbolized statements are tautologous, self-contradictory, or contingent? 1. N horseshoe (N horseshoe N) 2. (G horseshoe G) horseshoe G 3. (~K horseshoe H) triple bar ~(H v K)
How do truth tables work? I really don't understand how you go about them (especially with ones that state something "is not the case") When constructing truth tables I dont understand how a "^" or a "v" becomes false. For example: ((Q ∧(¬¬P ∨ R))∨ ¬ { P ∧ Q}) (Peter Smith - An Introduction to Formal Logic)
I need help with a finite math problem using truth tables.? Jack, Janet, and Chrissy meet at their local corner coffee house and buy 6 doughnuts. Each friend always tells the truth or always lies. Jack says he got one doughnut but Janet says Jack got two and Chrissy says Jack got more than three. On the other hand, all three friends agree that Janet got 2. Assuming that each friend got atleast 1 doughnut and no doughnut was cut or divided. How many doughnuts did each friend get? I have no idea how to do this problem. I think you have to use a truth table. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you
I have an introductory logic question about truth tables? I know how to do the basic truth tables....but I missed class last week and do not know what this symbol means I- Here is one of the questiions....we have to tell if this statement is valid or invalid by conducting a truth table and I do not know what that symbol means ~(PvQ) I- ~P&~Q
Logic Gates And Truth Tables? I would really appreciate it if could someone help complete the following truth tables, and logic gates. I think the first one is done correctly. For 2, you need to create a logic gate, and for 3 &4 i need the correct truth table. The image below shows the truth tables and questions http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/4443/120fy3.jpg Thank You
Logic truth tables help? use regular or shorter truth tables to prove the validity or invalidity of the following p -> ( q -> r ) q -> ( r -> s ) ---------------- p -> s
Help with Truth Tables...Electrical Engineering help? Help with this q: 1) Create a truth Table for the following functions: a) F= x'y + y'z' + xyz b) G= xy + (x'+z)(y+z') c) H= wx + xy' + wx'z' + xyz' + w'xy' how should i create these truth tables. I looked over my notes and im lost. Can someone show me how to do these 3?
Logical Reasoning - TRUTH TABLES? Please help me. I'm doing homeschooling and can't clearly understand this. I'm not getting the right answere. Use truth tables to establish the following logical equivalencies known as the distributive laws. 1.P v (Q ^ R) ≡ (P v Q) ^ (P v R) ------------------------------------------------------------ 2.P ^ (Q v R) ≡ (P^Q) v (P^R)
Truth Tables for SL - Logic? I have a question regarding truth table in Logic I need to test the validity of the following. If 4 is a prime then 4 is even If 4 is a prime then 4 is not even :. 4 is not prime. Can somebody please give me a clue on where to start? cheers ok here is the actaul question i am being asked. Use the method of truth tables to test the following argument for validity in SL (Setential Language) If 4..... (as above)
Truth Tables - conditional statement.? I’m doing homeschooling and need to submit this within this week. So, please help. Thanks 2. Let a, b, c be integers. Consider the following conditional statement. ----------------------- If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c. -------------------------------------------- Which of the following statements have the same meaning as this conditional statement and which ones are negations of this conditional statement? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note: This is not asking which statements are true and which are false. It is asking which statement are logically equivalent to the given statement. It might be helpful to let P represent the hypothesis of the given statement, Q represent the conclusion, and then determine a symbolic representation for each statement. Instead of using truth tables, try to use already established logical equivalencies to justify your conclusions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-If a divides b or a divides c, then a divides bc. 2-If a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc. 3-a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c. 4-If a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc. 5-a does not divide bc or a divides b or a divides c. 6-if a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b. 7-if a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c. So confusing, but I LOVE YOU GUYS FOR HELPING ME!!!!!!! Misty
MATH!!!! TRUTH TABLES!? OKAY SOOO IM HAVING A REAL DIFFICULT TIME LEARNING TRUTH TABLES!!! WE ARE LEARNING THE ABOUT THE NEGATION, CONJUNCTION, DISJUNCTION, CONDITIONAL, and BIOCONDITIONAL AND HOW TO PUT THEM ALL IN TRUTH TABLES!!! UGH IM SOOOO LOST! I NEED SOME GOOD EXPLANATIONS ON HOW TO PUT THEM INTO TRUTH BOXES BCUZ I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND!! PLEAASSSE SOMEONE EXPLAIN OR GIVE ME A GOOD WEBSITE TO GIVE EASY STEPS TO DOING THESE!! THANKSSSSSSSSSSSSS! :] AHAHA! IM SOO FRUSTRATED!
TRUTH TABLES - LOGIC? I am having a bit of trouble with a couple of questions in my Logic assignment. Can anyone give me any advice? or better still the answers? 3. Draw up truth tables for the following. Say whether each is valid, contingent or inconsistent: (a) (A V B) & B (b) ((A → B) V (B → A)) (c) (A→ (B V C)) → ((A → B) V C) 4. Use the method of truth tables to test the following argument for validity in SL: If 4 is prime then 4 is even If 4 is prime then 4 is not even :. 4 is not prime
evaluate truth tables.? evaluate truth tables for each of the following: a) p ^ (~q) b) (~p) v (~q) c) (~( p v q ) ) ^ ( (~p) v q)
Truth Tables are sending me round the twist!? I'm studying truth tables and they are a pain in the butt! I understand disjunction (OR),negation (NOT) and conjunction(AND) but ive lost myself with A AND NOT B...how do i do this? If A is True and B is False, how do i figure out what A AND NOT B is? Im not looking for an answer to the equation i want to understand how to work out A AND NOT B. Any links to sites that explain the 'AND NOT rule' would be much appreciated too. Thanks! You two are great!! Thanks !
Truth tables?? Help... for my logic class? I'm not even sure if this is the correct way to do the truth functional logical format for this but they are here is the argument: If Paul keeps his GPA above 3.3 this semester, then he will be graduating with honors. And his GPA is 3.7. So he's going to be graduating with honors. K>H (&) K =H what I really want to know is how to do the truth tables (my book doesn't explain it very well) and did I do the format correctly? The next one is: Paul will be graduating with honors only if he keeps his GPA above 3.3 this semester. He will keep his GPA above 3.3 only if he studies an extra 20 hours per week. So Paul will be graduating with honors only if he studies an extra 20 hours per week. H>K K>S H>S for both of them H= Paul will be graduating with honors. K= Paul keeps his GPA above 3.3 S= Paul studies an extra 20 hours per week.
Real world application for a truth table? Can anyone give me an example of a real world situation in which a truth table would be beneficial? I understand the concept, but I am having a hard time seeing how I can use it in the real world.
truth tables: (AU~B)->~C and ~(~AUB)->C? Studying for finals and my memory cant recall this. I need to do a truth table and determine whether the 2 statements are equivalent. This is what I have so far: AB~B(AU~B) TTFT TFTT FTFF FFTT However now I'm stuck on how to bring in the third value C. Help please?
Digital Electronics: How can I draw a truth table for the traffic lights? i would like to draw a a set of traffic lights. The lights are designed to control access from a secondary road to a major road, so the time the lights spend at red (R) is longer than the time spent at green (G). The actual timings are to be as follows: Y = 1:5s R = 1:20s R and Y = 1:5s G = 1:10setc how can I draw a truth table for the problem?
Truth tables...tautology? Use a truth table to find out whether: ((A ^ (A => B)) ^ (B => C) => C is a tautology. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Help with TRUTH TABLES (please)!? ive been stuck on two problems. i just cant get them. heres one. Use the symbols ^(conjunction), disjunction, and '(not, negation) to form a sentence involving p and q whose truth table is given p q ? T T F T F F F T T F F F so you need to make a sentence that will make the truth table true.
Need help with Carry In Truth Tables!!!? I am working with the below "Carry in" Truth Table A B C SUM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 and have to convert it into an expression using AND, NOT, OR I have come up with this: (A & B & C)+(A & -B & -C)+(-A & B -C)+(-A & -B & C) It uses a combination of 16 AND, NOT, OR. How do I get this down to using only 8? Thanks How do I show XOR C?
Question about Propositional Logic. Invalid arguments and truth tables? A few quarters ago I took a logic course. Teacher explained that when you have a symbolized argument... and you create a truth table for it... if there is a single line in the truth table that has true premises and a false conclusion, the entire argument has to be thrown out as invalid. At the time I understood that... but I have been looking back over logic and now its confusing me. Suppose an argument has two lines on which the premises are both true, but one has a false conclusion. Must the argument be considered invalid still? Or should the argument still hold valid under the conditions that created the true premises and true conclusion? It seems to me that the conditions that created the true premises and false conclusion, though a part of the argument hypothetically, may not be factually possible What I mean is that some lines of the truth table are not realistically possible in reality... but does that necessarily invalidate the argument when the possible lines of the truth table still hold valid
Truth tables? Can anyone help me with this q, please? Work out the truth table for a bargraph driver which inputs a 3 bit number xyz (i.e. x, y, z are the digits of a 3 bit binary number, from left to right) and outputs a,b,c,d,e,f,g (so a is the bottom light and g is the top light). thanks xx
a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables)? determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demostrate validity by deductions using Group I rules. Arg 1. P-->Q 2. ~P ^:~Q Arg If Peter is perceptive, then Quincy is a quack. Quincy, however, is not a quack. So Peter's not perceptive. (Hint: this is a valid argument)
how do you find out what the outputs will be for an OR logic gate truth table? In the electronics exam I'll may have to write the outputs for 3 input OR logic gate. How can you find out the output if Input A is 0, Input B is 1 and Input 3 is 0? Is there a way to calculate it or do it on a calculator? I know the boolean equation for the OR gate is A + B. But that's all I know. So does anyone know a way to calculate the output? or on a calculator?
i need help in math truth tables.... what the? what the heck am i supposed to do?! it makes no sense!!!!! then there is converse, inverse, and conttrapositive ones. my tiny head is gonna pop! help me out please! my book really wont help me out.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers